Offensive Attack on Free Speech

I haven't blogged in a while, because Twitter is easier and faster.
but this is much too long for a Tweet:

An email I received:

From: Levana - Health Care for America Now <hcan@healthcareforamericanow.org>
Date: Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:53 PM
Subject: Join us - special briefing from Rep. Doggett, actress Edie Falco, and more
To:[redacted]

Dear [redacted]:

By now, I'm sure you've heard about the lobbyist-funded right-wing extremists making trouble at town halls all across America.

These disruptions are funded by special interests like the insurance companies, who want to kill health care reform as quickly as possible.¹ They're trying to make sure nobody can have a productive, rational conversation about what health care reform will do for you and me. We can't let them stifle debate or we will not win health care reform this year.

So, we've organized a special briefing with Texas Representative Lloyd Doggett, actress Edie Falco, Richard Kirsch, Health Care for America Now's National Campaign Director, and Dan Heck, a regional director for Working America and Health Care for America Now to get the facts out about health care reform, find out what's at stake, and learn what you and I can do to help pass reform.

Can you join us for a special briefing on Tuesday, August 11th at 9 pm EST (6 pm PST) to learn about health care reform and how to right back against the lobbyist-funded right-wing? Click here to RSVP.

We've lined up some speakers on the call who really know what they're talking about.

Texas Representative Lloyd Doggett talk about his experiences with these disruption tactics and what you can expect. Actress and advocate Edie Falco will tell you what's at stake. Richard Kirsch, our National Campaign Director, will talk about our historic progress on passing health reform and what we need to do to get it over the finish line. And Dan Heck, a regional director for Working America and Health Care for America Now who's out there every day talking to real people about this issue will give you tips on how to combat some of the biggest myths out there on health reform and how to get involved in your community.

Can you join us for this special briefing with Representative Doggett, Edie Falco, Richard Kirsch, Dan Heck, and thousands of activists and organizers like you and me? Click here to RSVP for the call on Tuesday, August 11th at 9 pm EST (6pm PST).

We'll also take questions for the speakers. You can submit a question you'd like to ask when you sign up to RSVP for the training call.

It's crucial that we're out there busting myths and promoting health reform every day in August while Congress is back at home, listening to their voters.

Please join us!

To your health,

Levana Layendecker
Health Care for America Now

P.S. We've been busy loading hundreds of local town hall events into our system. It's crucial supporters of health care reform get out and make our voices heard this month while Congress is home listening to you. Click here to go to our homepage and search for events in your area.

1. Inside The Tea-Partiers Anti-Health Care Organizing Campaign - Talking Points Memo

Democrats Want High Gas Prices

House Democrats fail to resurrect a bill to punish gas price gouging, but move to block GOP attempts to expand offshore oil drilling, an idea gaining in popularity amid $4-a-gallon gas prices.

Democrats want to keep gas prices high.
Democrats block all efforts to increase supply.
Democrats are trying to destroy the US Economy, this is the only logical reason for working so hard to keep gas prices high by blocking new refineries, preventing exploration for more oil in the US, and for not allowing oil companies to drill new wells in the US.

Democrats are Dumb.

VOTE FRAUD PAID FOR BY

DEMOCRATS

Obama has paid ACORN $800,000.

The Democrat Sec. of State in Ohio, Ms Brunner,
has criminally refused to tell the county Boards of Election
about the 200,000 mismatched voter registrations.

Obama can only win thru vote fraud.

Honest people will not vote for him.

See ACE for more details.

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr

(Speech Delivered on the steps at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington D.C. on August 28, 1963.)

Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand signed the Emancipation Proclamation. This momentous decree came as a great beacon light of hope to millions of Negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice. It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of captivity. But one hundred years later, we must face the tragic fact that the Negro is still not free.
One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still languishing in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land.
So we have come here today to dramatize an appalling condition. In a sense we have come to our nation’s capital to cash a check. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir.
This note was a promise that all men would be guaranteed the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note insofar as her citizens of color are concerned. Instead of honoring this sacred obligation, America has given the Negro people a bad check which has come back marked “insufficient funds.” But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation.
So we have come to cash this check — a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice. We have also come to this hallowed spot to remind America of the fierce urgency of now. This is no time to engage in the luxury of cooling off or to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism. Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. Now is the time to open the doors of opportunity to all of God’s children. Now is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood.
It would be fatal for the nation to overlook the urgency of the moment and to underestimate the determination of the Negro. This sweltering summer of the Negro’s legitimate discontent will not pass until there is an invigorating autumn of freedom and equality. Nineteen sixty-three is not an end, but a beginning. Those who hope that the Negro needed to blow off steam and will now be content will have a rude awakening if the nation returns to business as usual. There will be neither rest nor tranquility in America until the Negro is granted his citizenship rights.
The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges. But there is something that I must say to my people who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice. In the process of gaining our rightful place we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred.
We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. we must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force.
The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to distrust of all white people, for many of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny and their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom.
We cannot walk alone. And as we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall march ahead. We cannot turn back. There are those who are asking the devotees of civil rights, “When will you be satisfied?” we can never be satisfied as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities. We cannot be satisfied as long as the Negro’s basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto to a larger one. We can never be satisfied as long as a Negro in Mississippi cannot vote and a Negro in New York believes he has nothing for which to vote. No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.
I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of great trials and tribulations. Some of you have come fresh from narrow cells. Some of you have come from areas where your quest for freedom left you battered by the storms of persecution and staggered by the winds of police brutality. You have been the veterans of creative suffering. Continue to work with the faith that unearned suffering is redemptive.
Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed. Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. I say to you today, my friends, that in spite of the difficulties and frustrations of the moment, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.
I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: “We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal.” I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slaveowners will be able to sit down together at a table of brotherhood. I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a desert state, sweltering with the heat of injustice and oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice. I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. I have a dream today.
I have a dream that one day the state of Alabama, whose governor’s lips are presently dripping with the words of interposition and nullification, will be transformed into a situation where little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls and walk together as sisters and brothers. I have a dream today. I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight, and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together. This is our hope. This is the faith with which I return to the South. With this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope. With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day.
This will be the day when all of God’s children will be able to sing with a new meaning, “My country, ’tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing. Land where my fathers died, land of the pilgrim’s pride, from every mountainside, let freedom ring.” And if America is to be a great nation, this must become true. So let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire. Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York. Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania! Let freedom ring from the snowcapped Rockies of Colorado! Let freedom ring from the curvaceous peaks of California! But not only that; let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia! Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee! Let freedom ring from every hill and every molehill of Mississippi. From every mountainside, let freedom ring.
When we let freedom ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God’s children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, “Free at last! free at last! thank God Almighty, we are free at last!”

Gun Rights and Laws - IMHO

In My Humble Opinion,

It should be as easy to get a gun license as it is to get a driver's license.

It should be as easy to register a gun as it is to register a motor vehicle.

It should be legal to carry a gun, if you have a gun license.

This allows for self/home defense.

Just like some motor vehicles are not street legal,
some types of guns can be listed as not street legal. (ie. gun is only legal outside of city limits.) and some types of guns can be listed as illegal for civilian use. (ie. automatic weapons.)

Trigger locks should not be required, but available if court ordered -
like the ignition locks for some habitual drunk drivers.

The state should not limit the number of guns a lawfully licensed person may own.

Gun owners should be required to keep their weapons secure.

Now the real touchy issue is guns on private property that is open to the public. (ie stores)
I think the property owner should decide.
AND
the property owner should be held responsible for the safety of the guests on their property.

Another issue: Employees vs Employers who forbid guns on the property.
I think employees should be allowed to keep their weapons secured in the vehicle at their place of employment;
Or employers should be held responsible for the safety of their employees as they travel to/from work.

Another question: Guns at school.

for school employees - see above, this is simply a question of employee vs employer.

for students - grades pre-k to 12 - no weapons at school or on school bus. (with a common sense definition of weapon vs the idiotic results of 'zero-tolerance')

for college/continuing ed students -
if they have a gun license from the state,
if the gun is registered with the state,
if student has permission for the college (ie clean behavior and academic record)
if the gun is registered with the college (ie college can limit number of weapons)
- yes, allowed to carry on campus.

Democrats Only Want Criminals to have Guns

Supreme Court Decision Makes Americans Less Safe (Sen. Frank Lautenberg)

June 26th, 2008

Today, President Bush’s radical Supreme Court justices put rigid ideology ahead of the safety of communities in New Jersey and across the country. This decision illustrates why I have strongly opposed extremist judicial nominees and will continue to do so in the future. The American people demand and deserve strong, common-sense laws to prevent gun violence. I will continue to work to pass my legislation to close the gun show loophole and stop terrorists from getting guns.

Senator,

The gun ban in DC, made Washington DC the murder capital of the world. Law-abiding citizens were/are defenseless in the face of gun-toting criminals.

Kennesaw, Georgia has a law requiring homeowners to have a firearm. Since this law was enacted in the early 1980's - there have been zero (0) gun deaths in Kennesaw. And the overall crime rate in Kannesaw dropped by 70% in the first year after the law went into effect. Kennesaw, GA remains one of the safest cities in the world.

Allowing law-abiding citizens to own firearms, will reduce crime.

Law-abiding citizens must have the means to protect themselves and their family.

Ruling Destroys Seventy Years of Precedent (Sen. Dianne Feinstein)

June 26th, 2008

...

I remember both Justice Roberts and Justice Alito sitting in front of us and indicating how they would respect stare decisis and precedent – and this decision takes down 70 years of precedent.

...

... I speak as somebody who authorized assault weapons legislation, who believes that it was working when it was allowed to expire. I speak as somebody who has watched this nation with its huge homicide rate, when countries that have sane restrictions on weapons do not have that homicide rate.

...

Unbelievably, this decision also strikes down the DC trigger lock requirement, which simply ensures that the gun won’t be used by someone who steals it, or finds it, or doesn’t own it.

...

...


Senator,

You are wrong.

Kennesaw, Georgia has a law requiring homeowners to have a firearm. Since this law was enacted in the early 1980's - there have been zero (0) gun deaths in Kennesaw. And the overall crime rate in Kannesaw dropped by 70% in the first year after the law went into effect. Kennesaw, GA remains one of the safest cities in the world.

Disarming law-abiding citizens, preventing law-abiding citizens from having the means to protect themselves --- ENCOURAGES CRIMINALS TO COMMIT CRIMES.

Disarming law-abiding citizens, preventing law-abiding citizens from having the means to protect themselves ---MAKES PEOPLE LESS SAFE.

Heller, YES!!!

"The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a
firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for
traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home."

Justice Scalia
Majority Opinion
Heller vs D.C.
6/26/08


The above is the money quote from the Heller vs D.C. Gun Control case.

We, the Citizens of the United States, have the individual right to own a firearm for the lawful purpose of self-defense.


The meat of the decision:

.

Held:
1. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a
firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for
traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.
Pp. 2–53.
(a) The Amendment’s prefatory clause announces a purpose, but
does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative
clause. The operative clause’s text and history demonstrate that it
connotes an individual right to keep and bear arms. Pp. 2–22.
(b) The prefatory clause comports with the Court’s interpretation
of the operative clause. The “militia” comprised all males physically
capable of acting in concert for the common defense. The Antifederalists
feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in
order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing
army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress
power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear
arms, so that the ideal of a citizens’ militia would be preserved.
Pp. 22–28.
(c) The Court’s interpretation is confirmed by analogous armsbearing
rights in state constitutions that preceded and immediately
followed the Second Amendment. Pp. 28–30.
(d) The Second Amendment’s drafting history, while of dubious
interpretive worth, reveals three state Second Amendment proposals
that unequivocally referred to an individual right to bear arms.
Pp. 30–32.
(e) Interpretation of the Second Amendment by scholars, courts
and legislators, from immediately after its ratification through the
late 19th century also supports the Court’s conclusion. Pp. 32–47.
(f) None of the Court’s precedents forecloses the Court’s interpretation.
Neither United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542, 553, nor
Presser v. Illinois, 116 U. S. 252, 264–265, refutes the individualrights
interpretation. United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174, does not
limit the right to keep and bear arms to militia purposes, but rather
limits the type of weapon to which the right applies to those used by
the militia, i.e., those in common use for lawful purposes. Pp. 47–54.
2. Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited.
It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any
manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed
weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment
or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast
doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by
felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms
in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or
laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of
arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those
“in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition
of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons.
Pp. 54–56.
3. The handgun ban and the trigger-lock requirement (as applied to
self-defense) violate the Second Amendment. The District’s total ban
on handgun possession in the home amounts to a prohibition on an
entire class of “arms” that Americans overwhelmingly choose for the
lawful purpose of self-defense. Under any of the standards of scrutiny
the Court has applied to enumerated constitutional rights, this
prohibition—in the place where the importance of the lawful defense
of self, family, and property is most acute—would fail constitutional
muster. Similarly, the requirement that any lawful firearm in the
home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock makes it impossible
for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and
is hence unconstitutional. Because Heller conceded at oral argument
that the D. C. licensing law is permissible if it is not enforced arbitrarily
and capriciously, the Court assumes that a license will satisfy
his prayer for relief and does not address the licensing requirement.
Assuming he is not disqualified from exercising Second Amendment
rights, the District must permit Heller to register his handgun and
must issue him a license to carry it in the home. Pp. 56–64.
478 F. 3d 370, affirmed.

SCALIA, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS,
C. J., and KENNEDY, THOMAS, and ALITO, JJ., joined. STEVENS, J., filed a
dissenting opinion, in which SOUTER, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ.,
joined. BREYER, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which STEVENS,
SOUTER, and GINSBURG, JJ., joined.

Liberals Want Law-Abiding Citizens to be Defenseless in the Face of Criminals

Justice Stephen Breyer wrote a separate dissent in which he said,

“In my view, there simply is no untouchable constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment to keep loaded handguns in the house in crime-ridden urban areas.”

So, Justice Breyer thinks law-abiding citizens should be defenseless in crime-ridden areas.
Justice Breyer also opposes the death penalty for child rapists.

Liberals want to live in a crime ridden society, where muggers, thieves, rapists and murders roam the streets, and law abiding citizens fear for their lives.

Obama Quote

"I think that the right might worry a bit more about the dangers of sectarianism. Whatever we once were, we're no longer a Christian nation; at least not just; we are also a Jewish nation, the Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers..."
Barack Hussein Obama. Campaign 08 video

Wrong, we are a Christian Nation that allows the Freedom of Religion.
The United States of American allows you to chose to believe or not.

This great nation will not force you to pray,
unlike the 57 Moslem states which force you to adhere to their barbaric religion.

These 57 Moslem states are trying to force all nations to submit to Islam.

Note:
Islam is the only religion which prevents its followers from converting to another faith,
UNDER PAIN OF DEATH.

Also Note: the phrase is "the Muslim" vs "a Christian" "a Jewish" "a Hindu" etc,

World Leader endorses Obama

Following are excerpts from a public address delivered by Libyan Leader Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi marking the anniversary of the U.S. air raid on Libya. The address aired on Al-Jazeera TV on June 11, 2008:

Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi:

It has been proven that there is no democracy in [the U.S.]. Rather, it is a dictatorship no different than the dictatorships of Hitler, Napoleon, Mussolini, Genghis Khan, Alexander the Great, and the rest of the tyrants. In the days of crazy Reagan, the American president issued a presidential order to launch a war against Libya, for example, a presidential order to besiege Libya, a presidential order to boycott Libya, and so on. Is this a democracy or a dictatorship?

There are elections in America now. Along came a black citizen of Kenyan African origins, a Muslim, who had studied in an Islamic school in Indonesia. His name is Obama. All the people in the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa applauded this man. They welcomed him and prayed for him and for his success, and they may have even been involved in legitimate contribution campaigns to enable him to win the American presidency. But we were taken by surprise when our African Kenyan brother, who is an American national, made statements that shocked all his supporters in the Arab world, in Africa, and in the Islamic world. We hope that this is merely an elections "clearance sale," as they say in Egypt – in other words, merely an elections lie. As you know, this is the farce of elections – a person lies and lies to people, just so that they will vote for him, and afterwards, when they say to him: :"You promised this and that," he says: "No, this was just elections propaganda." This is the farce of democracy for you. He says: "This was propaganda, and you thought I was being serious. I was fooling you to get your votes."

Allah willing, it will turn out that this was merely elections propaganda. Obama said he would turn Jerusalem into the eternal capital of the Israelis. This indicates that our brother Obama is ignorant of international politics, and is not familiar with the Middle East conflict.

We thought he would say: "I have decided that if I win, I will monitor the Dimona nuclear plant, and the other WMDs in Israeli's possession." We expected him to make such a decision. He undoubtedly had this in mind. When he talked about Iran and its nuclear program, he undoubtedly had Dimona in mind. But when he was thinking about Dimona, he undoubtedly had the fate of former president Kennedy on his mind as well. Kennedy decided to monitor the Dimona nuclear plant. He insisted on doing so, in order to determine whether or not it produces nuclear weapons. The Israelis refused, but he insisted. This crisis was resolved with the resignation of Ben-Gurion. He resigned so he would not have to agree to the monitoring of the Dimona plant, and he gave the green light for the killing of Kennedy. Kennedy was killed because he insisted on the monitoring of the Dimona plant. This image was undoubtedly on Obama's mind. He undoubtedly wanted to talk about this, but decided not to.

We expected him to say: "If I win, I will implement the one-state solution – the "Isratine" which appears in Qadhafi's White Book." This idea constitutes the final, deep-rooted, and historic solution. It is impossible to establish two midget-states in this area. What kind of country is only 15 km deep? The so-called Israel is only 15 km deep. What kind of a country is this?

There are five million Palestinians there. We expected Obama to say: "I've decided to return millions of Palestinian refugees to the land of Palestine, from which they were expelled in 1948 and 1967." This is the "change" that the peoples applaud, the change that the American people – and the black people in America – want.

We expected him to say: "I will strive for the independence and unity of the Kurdish nation. This nation must take its place under the sun in the Middle East." The Kurdish nation is torn apart, tormented, and persecuted, and is colonized by everyone. He should have supported it, instead of supporting the collaborators, while sacrificing the future of the Kurdish nation. This is "change."

The thing we fear most is that the black man suffers from an inferiority complex. This is dangerous. If our brother Obama feels that because he is black he doesn't have the right to rule America, this would be a disaster, because such a feeling would make him behave whiter than the white, and go to an extreme in his persecution and degradation of the blacks.

We say to him: Brother, the whites and blacks in America are equal. They are all immigrants. America belongs neither to the whites nor to the blacks. America belongs to its original inhabitants, the Indians. Both the whites and the blacks immigrated to America, and so they are equal, and Obama has the right to hold his head high, and say: "I am a partner in America. This is my land as much as it is yours. If it is not my land, it is not yours either. It is the land of the Indians. You are immigrants, and so are we."

We still hope that this black man will take pride in his African and Islamic identity, and in his faith, and that [he will know that he has rights in America, and that he will change America from evil to good, and that America will establish relations that will serve it well with other peoples, especially the Arabs.

Obama's Image Control

Senator Obama needs help in controlling his public image.
Being the helpful guy I am, I had to assist:



Now back to the main massage of Obama's Campaign:



This is a public service of the Crusaders of the Just Say No to B.O. Committee

Cheerleaders vs A Coward

NFL Cheerleaders Visit Baghdad - But Senator Obama is too afraid to visit Iraq.

Cheerleaders know it is safe for them to visit and entertain our troops.

Barack Hussein Obama is too scared to go. And he travels with a Secret Service Security Detail.

Granted the Marines will give a much warmer reception to the cheerleaders, but the Marines have made Iraq a safe place to visit. Safer than visiting Washington DC.

Barack Hussein Obama is a coward.

For pictures click here

Obama's Birth Certificate

Why won't Obama release his birth certificate?

Does it say that his mother was not legally married at the time of his birth? (Meaning B O is a bastard.)

Or

Does it say that B O was born a Moslem? (Meaning that his choice of Christianity, now requires all Moslems to kill him.)

Or

BOTH OF THE ABOVE.

Without some evidence to show that B O was not born in Hawaii, and therefore not a US Citizen, I will not believe he and his family have been lying about his place of birth for his entire life.
(If he is not a US Citizen - he is not eligible for membership in the US Senate,
If he is not a natural born US Citizen - he is not eligible to be President of the United States.)
Proof of his citizenship status should be on file at the US Senate, ie it should be a public record at the US Senate.

Barack Hussein Obama

B.O. is the Democrat nominee for President of the United States.

But it isn't over till the fat lady (in the pantsuit) sings, Hillary has not done that yet.

Will B. O.'s many connections to the Nation of Islam - cause the super-delegates of the Democratic Party to switch their vote to Hillary? Or will the threat of rioting prevent that?

Will B. O. survive till Election Day, I mean literally survive till then?
If he takes Hillary as his Veep, his chances of survival go down.

I say - SAY NO TO B.O.

Obama: Politician not a Christian

Senator Obama has run away from the Trinity United Church of Christ.

Obama did not renounce its spiritual guidance, he has quit the church for purely political reasons. Obama still believes that a good Christian should preach "G-D Damn America" .

Senator Obama is now free to return to his original religion - Islam.
(As a child Barack Hussein Obama was raised a Moslem. As an adult, he chose a 'Black Church' which has close ties to the Nation of Islam and Trinity United has openly supported Hamas.)

Or maybe Obama will renounce G-d and publicly embrace Communism, with its total control over the lives of its citizens.

BUT now the most important thing to Obama is surviving (literally) the never ending challenge from Hillary Clinton.

Cluster Bombs and other topics

111 nations agree to ban 'cluster bombs' - the US is not one of those nations. GOOD.

from MSNBC

Twelve days of negotiations ended after diplomats from scores of nations delivered speeches embracing the accord. It requires signatories not to use cluster bombs, to destroy existing stockpiles within eight years, and to fund programs that clear old battlefields of dud bombs.

Key states didn't join talks
However, the talks did not involve the biggest makers and users of cluster bombs: the United States, Russia, China, Israel, India and Pakistan. And the pact leaves the door open for new types that could pick targets more precisely and contain self-destruct technology.

Let's see the treaty requires the nations which signed it -
to stop using cluster bombs - sorry, they are an effective weapon and the US might built better cluster bombs in the future.
to fund programs that clear old battlefields...so ya'll wanted the US to pay to clean up.

Even money sez - Obama will speak in support of joining this treaty. Obama will desire to weaken and handcuff our military.

****

Hillary Clinton will demand the DNC rules be scrapped - because she wants to benefit from breaking the rules to gave an advantage (Remember - Hillary was the ONLY candidate who FORGOT to withdraw from the Michigan Primary. And Hillary's ad was run in Florida by CNN, despite Hillary's pledge not to campaign in Florida)

Rules do not apply to the Clintons. Rules only exist to hamper those who oppose the Clintons.

Sorry, but, the fat lady in the pantsuit needs to accept her defeat and start singing the blues.

****

I DO NOT WANT A VICTIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
I WANT A LEADER IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

I will vote for John McCain.

I do not completely agree with him.
but I will vote for him.

Obama and Appeasement

”Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along,” the President said to the country’s legislative body, “We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: ‘Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.’ We have an obligation to call this what it is –- the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.”
Geo. W. Bush, 5/15/08

Barack Hussein Obama wants to have talks with Iran, without preconditions.
Sen. Obama wants to appease terrorists and their sponsors.

President Bush has nailed him and the surrender first Democrats (Pelosi, Reid).

Moslems want to kill.
Islam is the religion of death.
Islam praises those who kill innocent men, women and children.
Moslems attack shopping centers, they do not care who they kill as long as they kill somebody.

Democrats

Well, the Democrat Nomination Derby is over, the fat lady in the pantsuit is singing the blues.

A narrow win in Indiana vs a big loss in North Carolina, the filly loses the derby.

The only question that remains is: Will the party shoot the filly or will the filly shoot the party?

Senator Clinton's only chance now is getting the Michigan (oops, I forgot to remove my name.) and Florida (oops, CNN ran that ad nationally.) delegates seated at the convention.

Because the media will return to ignoring Senator Barack Hussein Obama's ties to Islam -- oops I mean his ties to the Muslim-- oops, I meant former Muslim, Rev. Wright.

So, the Democrats have chosen an inexperienced candidate who Hamas wants elected President.

But, then their other choice was an inexperienced candidate who is married to an impeached and disbarred former President.

Question: Will America be better off with a lawyer as President or with a former Naval Officer, who refused special treatment from his captors and endured torture instead?

Me, I'll take the former Naval Officer, who is a liberal Republican vs a lawyer.

Challenge to Conservatives

An Election challenge for conservatives, designed to show why voting in November is important even if you can not vote for John McCain.

Name your US Senators:
Mine are Chambliss and Isakson.

If a one of your Senators is up for re-election, Will you vote for them and Why? Name the challenger if you will not vote to re-elect your Senator.
Senator Chambliss is up for re-election. I will vote for him because he is a solid Republican Senator, opposed to amnesty for illegals, strong on defense.

Name your Congressman (or Congresswoman):
Mine is Tom Price.

Will you vote to return him (her) to Congress, Why or Why not?
Yes, I want to return Tom Price to Congress. He is a solid conservative Republican.

Remember there are more offices besides the Oval Office to be filled in November.
Please tell your readers to vote in November. The down ballot offices are important.

All three of the Presidential candidates favor open borders, our only hope is blocking them in the House of Representatives.

The new President will likely appoint one maybe two new Supreme Court Justices (Stevens and Ginsberg are old). We must keep enough Senators (at least 40) to be able to moderate these lifetime appointments.

Our only hope for blocking tax increases is in the House of Representatives and with 40 Senators to filibuster the increases, remember the 'Bush Tax Cuts' expire in 2010.

Voting: A Civic Duty

UPDATE: The more I read about McCain, the more I distrust him.
The latest 2-4-08 polls (RealClearPolitics.com)
show a virtual tie between Romney and McCain,
plus they show Obama well ahead of Clinton.

Option 3 is now in play: Vote for Romney.

BUT, since the pollsters have been very wrong earlier this year in NH.

DO I

VOTE AGAINST MCCAIN
or
VOTE AGAINST CLINTON

VOTING AGAINST CLINTON is VERY IMPORTANT TO THE WELFARE OF THIS NATION,
but
MCCAIN is NEARLY AS EVIL AS CLINTON.

Hmmm

Original post below:


Voting is a Civic Duty, but do I vote FOR somebody or AGAINST somebody.
My Presidential voting record:
I voted for Reagan, Reagan, Bush, Bush, (did not vote), Bush, Bush.
But at this time, I am not for either McCain, Huckabee, or Romney.
But, I am against Clinton, more than I am against Obama.

McCain is a Liberal Republican, strong on defense, weak on immigration, and would likely appoint moderate justices.
Romney is a Moderate Republican, strong on defense, weak on social issues, and might appoint conservative justices.
Huckabee is a joke.
Obama is a Liberal Democrat, weak on social issues, would appoint activist liberal justices, and is clueless on foreign affairs.
Clinton is a Socialist, seeking power for her own glory, uncaring about all others, and has a bad temper.

So, next Tuesday, in Georgia's OPEN primary -- how do I vote?
Huckabee is currently leading McCain - 29%-24% with Romney a distant 3rd at 18%
that leaves 29% undecided!
Obama is leading Clinton - 43%-35%
that leaves 22% undecided!

two voting options:
vote in the Republican primary for Fred Thompson...
to send a message that true conservatives are needed.
or
vote in the Democrat primary for Obama...
to help stop Clinton and to help keep the Democrat catfight going strong.

I am leaning strongly for option 2: Vote against Clinton.

Project Valour-IT

The ground pounders have taken the lead in fundraising for
Project Valour-IT,

The combined fleet (USN/USCG) needs to get going.

Lex has sailed, and please help save the dog.

Project Valour-IT (Voice Activated Laptops for Our Injured Troops) fundraising drive goes till Veterans Day.

Over 1500 injured soldiers, sailors, marines and airmen have benefited from this program. Soldiers Angels provides laptops, with voice recognition software to troops who have suffered hand injuries, this allows these troops the ability to use computers.

This is a registered charity, all donations are tax-deductable.